High Quality Designs at Affordable Rates
Propel Your Brand
Attract Attention
Concepts to Completion
Get Found, Get Seen, Get Results
Professional Website Design & Development
Marketing Matters Online is a UK based website design & development business set up and run by myself, Paul G - Wood. I have over 30 years of combined graphic and web design experience, along with extensive marketing knowledge working within various industries as well as specialising in both the Printing & Casino Industry. Primarily in Sales & Marketing, I have also worked in both fields operationally both in the UK & Internationally.
MMO is a creative and flexible Website Design Agency with extensive experience in Graphic design, Print and Marketing both on and offline. I have worked in media since 1984 and have been building websites since 2010. Specialising in creating unique graphics to boost your brand, as well as visual media that will help set you apart from your competition at an affordable price to suit all budgets.
With a commitment to my clients and an extensive skill set, which I am always developing, training and updating my approaches in line with rapidly developing technologies. I always strive to exceed expectations and provide the best possible ROI, Value for money and customer service possible
Contact me to find out how and what I can help create for you, your business, or a new project to generate the results you want with measurable marketing campaigns, strategies & solutions.
%20%5BConverted%5D-03.png)
Why can't robots pass CAPTCHA tests?
Although it's called a "Public Turing test," a CAPTCHA is really the opposite of a Turing test – it determines whether a supposedly human user is actually a computer program (a bot) or not, instead of trying to determine if a computer is human.
David Ricardo (1772–1823) was a classical economist best known for his theory on wages and profit, the labor theory of value, the theory of comparative advantage, and the theory of rents. David Ricardo and several other economists also simultaneously and independently discovered the law of diminishing marginal returns. His most well-known work is Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817).1
Another version as applied to life values...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comparative advantage in an economic model is the advantage over others in producing a particular good. A good can be produced at a lower relative opportunity cost or autarky price, i.e. at a lower relative marginal cost prior to trade.[1] Comparative advantage describes the economic reality of the work gains from trade for individuals, firms, or nations, which arise from differences in their factor endowments or technological progress.[2]
David Ricardo developed the classical theory of comparative advantage in 1817 to explain why countries engage in international trade even when one country's workers are more efficient at producing every single good than workers in other countries. He demonstrated that if two countries capable of producing two commodities engage in the free market (albeit with the assumption that the capital and labour do not move internationally[3]), then each country will increase its overall consumption by exporting the good for which it has a comparative advantage while importing the other good, provided that there exist differences in labor productivity between both countries.[4][5] Widely regarded as one of the most powerful[6] yet counter-intuitive[7] insights in economics, Ricardo's theory implies that comparative advantage rather than absolute advantage is responsible for much of international trade.
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Comparative advantage" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Adam Smith first alluded to the concept of absolute advantage as the basis for international trade in 1776, in The Wealth of Nations:
If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it off them with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage. The general industry of the country, being always in proportion to the capital which employs it, will not thereby be diminished [...] but only left to find out the way in which it can be employed with the greatest advantage.[8]
Writing several decades after Smith in 1808, Robert Torrens articulated a preliminary definition of comparative advantage as the loss from the closing of trade:
[I]f I wish to know the extent of the advantage, which arises to England, from her giving France a hundred pounds of broadcloth, in exchange for a hundred pounds of lace, I take the quantity of lace which she has acquired by this transaction, and compare it with the quantity which she might, at the same expense of labour and capital, have acquired by manufacturing it at home. The lace that remains, beyond what the labour and capital employed on the cloth, might have fabricated at home, is the amount of the advantage which England derives from the exchange.[9]
In 1814 the anonymously published pamphlet Considerations on the Importation of Foreign Corn featured the earliest recorded formulation of the concept of comparative advantage.[10][11] Torrens would later publish his work External Corn Trade in 1815 acknowledging this pamphlet author's priority.[10]
David Ricardo
In 1817, David Ricardo published what has since become known as the theory of comparative advantage in his book On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.
Graph illustrating Ricardo's example:
In case I (diamonds), each country spends 3600 hours to produce a mixture of cloth and wine.
In case II (squares), each country specializes in its comparative advantage, resulting in greater total output.
In a famous example, Ricardo considers a world economy consisting of two countries, Portugal and England, each producing two goods of identical quality. In Portugal, the a priori more efficient country, it is possible to produce wine and cloth with less labor than it would take to produce the same quantities in England. However, the relative costs or ranking of cost of producing those two goods differ between the countries.
Hours of work necessary to produce one unit | ||
Produce Country | Cloth | Wine |
England | 100 | 120 |
Portugal | 90 | 80 |
In this illustration, England could commit 100 hours of labor to produce one unit of cloth, or produce 5/6 units of wine. Meanwhile, in comparison, Portugal could commit 100 hours of labor to produce 10/9 units of cloth, or produce 10/8 units of wine. Portugal possesses an absolute advantage in producing both cloth and wine due to more produced per hour (since 10/9 > 1). If the capital and labour were mobile, both wine and cloth should be made in Portugal, with the capital and labour of England removed there.[12] If they were not mobile, as Ricardo believed them to be generally, then England's comparative advantage (due to lower opportunity cost) in producing cloth means that it has an incentive to produce more of that good which is relatively cheaper for them to produce than the other—assuming they have an advantageous opportunity to trade in the marketplace for the other more difficult to produce good.
In the absence of trade, England requires 220 hours of work to both produce and consume one unit each of cloth and wine while Portugal requires 170 hours of work to produce and consume the same quantities. England is more efficient at producing cloth than wine, and Portugal is more efficient at producing wine than cloth. So, if each country specializes in the good for which it has a comparative advantage, then the global production of both goods increases, for England can spend 220 labor hours to produce 2.2 units of cloth while Portugal can spend 170 hours to produce 2.125 units of wine. Moreover, if both countries specialize in the above manner and England trades a unit of its cloth for 5/6 to 9/8 units of Portugal's wine, then both countries can consume at least a unit each of cloth and wine, with 0 to 0.2 units of cloth and 0 to 0.125 units of wine remaining in each respective country to be consumed or exported. Consequently, both England and Portugal can consume more wine and cloth under free trade than in autarky.
The world of digital marketing has expanded rapidly, but with this growth has come a slew of problems. One of the pressing issues is the rise in bots spamming contact forms. Marketers are increasingly coming across fake leads, bot form fills, and survey bots, leading to multiple concerns. But why do these bots engage in this activity, and what are the broader implications for businesses?
Bots spam contact forms for various reasons, often related to digital marketing fraud. The simplest reason is to collect sensitive information such as email addresses, phone numbers, or other personal data that can be sold on the black market. Bots may also attempt to insert malicious links or fake content into your contact forms, which can harm your website's reputation and compromise user experience. Additionally, survey bots can skew the data collected from your online surveys, leading to inaccurate insights and flawed decision-making.
Spam form fills and fake form fills might sound similar, but they differ in intent and outcome:
Intent: Usually, spam form fills aim to promote a product, service, or website. The intention is to advertise, spread malware, or phish for information.
Content: These often contain irrelevant information, links to other sites, or promotional content.
Frequency: They may repeatedly occur, especially if a spam bot is set to constantly spam a particular form.
Example: A form meant for customer feedback receiving multiple entries promoting a random website or product.
Intent: Here, the intent is to deceive. Fake form fills might be used to mislead a system, create fictitious accounts or profiles, or gather insights without genuine user interaction.
Content: Contains false or made-up information, but it might be relevant to the form's purpose.
Frequency: It might be a one-time submission or repeated, depending on the purpose.
Example: A survey form meant to gather consumer preferences is filled with fabricated responses to skew the results.
In summary, while both spam and fake form fills introduce undesired or incorrect information into a system, spam form fills often have a promotional or malicious intent, while fake form fills are primarily deceptive in nature.
The consequences of bot form fills can be detrimental to your digital marketing efforts. First and foremost, they waste valuable resources by flooding your contact forms with irrelevant and often malicious data. This not only increases the workload for your team but also hinders genuine customer inquiries from reaching you promptly.
Moreover, bots can manipulate your campaign analytics, distorting metrics such as conversion rates and engagement levels. This skewed data can mislead you into making faulty decisions regarding your marketing strategies and budgets.
The hidden costs of bot spam extend beyond mere inconvenience and can have profound implications for businesses. One significant concern is the effect on employee morale. Continuously dealing with fake leads can demotivate team members, as they find themselves investing effort into tasks that yield no genuine benefits.
Furthermore, the integrity of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems is at stake. With bots populating these systems with erroneous leads, it can cause confusion and diminish the system's effectiveness in managing genuine customer relationships.
A more severe consequence arises in the context of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). This act prohibits businesses from sending unsolicited messages. When bots populate forms with authentic phone numbers, companies face the peril of unintentionally dispatching unwanted messages, which could lead to potential legal ramifications.
Lastly, the reputation of a brand is always at risk. Should customers discern that their genuine data is being conflated with bot-generated information or if they are the recipients of unsolicited messages due to bot activities, it could tarnish the brand's image and trustworthiness in their eyes.
BE VIGILANT & TAKE A MOMENT TO CHECK ALL IS AS IT SHOULD BE - IF IN DOUBT ALWYS REFER TO YOUR WEBMASTER.... WE ARE HERE TO HELP :-)
Source link:-